从整体看,受审读学报的学术质量还不算高,相当一部分学报创新性、前沿性、时代感不强。不少学报文章选题陈旧,重复他人的研究,甚至东拼西凑,还达不到原有水平。有些学报研究工作、总结经验的文章占有较大比重,或所发部分文章实际是有关形势政策方面的宣传、阐释,或是学科基本知识、基本原理的讲解,而不是学术 On the whole, the academic quality of the journals under study is not high. A considerable part of the journals are innovative, cutting-edge and contemporary. Many journal articles selected topics obsolete, repeat other people’s research, and even patchwork, but also failed to reach the original level. Some journals study and summarize the experience of the articles occupy a larger proportion, or the part of the article is actually issued on the situation and policy aspects of publicity, interpretation, or the basic knowledge of the discipline, the basic principles rather than academic