《归藏》被《周礼》称作“三易”之一,但其在先秦两汉绝少被称引,直到六朝才受到广泛关注。从《归藏》的流传路径来看,无论是六朝时的评论与称引还是清人的辑佚,其源头都是汲冢所出的易类文献。所谓的传世《归藏》,其实就是汲冢所出的类似“清华简《别卦》”、“王家台《易占》”以及“北大简《荆决》”、“清华简《筮法》”等易类文献的汇编,它包含了一种在战国时非常流行的筮占理论体系,但不一定与《周礼》所说的《归藏》有实际联系。 “Return to Tibet” was called by Zhou Li as one of the “Three Era”, but it was rarely called before the Qin and Han dynasties until it was widely concerned until the Six Dynasties. Judging from the circulating route of “returning to Tibet”, no matter from the comments and quotations in the Six Dynasties, The so-called “return to Tibet,” which is actually handed down, is actually similar to the “Guazhou” “Jinghua”, “ The compilation of such easy-to-be-written documents as ”Laws of the Qinghua Plain“, which contain a theoretical system that is very popular in the Warring States Period, but not necessarily related to the ”Return of Tibet" mentioned by Zhou Li .