论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:因女儿、女婿购房缺钱,我两年前从银行提前支取了2万元借给他们,但他们既没有出具借条,也没有约定还款期限。借钱半年后,他们的感情出现了裂痕,甚至闹起了离婚,居委会曾先后4次组织调解都未能成功调和他们的婚姻。这几次调解时我都在场,每次都提到他们借钱一事,前两次调解时女婿王某并未否认,后两次调解时他却谎称借款早已还清。现在我想上庭向他追讨借款,参与调解人员也愿意出庭为我作证,但因我手中没有借据,心里没有底。请问:没有借据,仅凭间接证据能认定借贷关系吗?
Editor’s Comrade: Due to lack of money for daughter and son-in-law, I borrowed 20,000 yuan from the bank two years ago and lent it to them. However, they did not issue an IOU nor did they agree on the repayment period. Six months after borrowing money, their feelings were rippled and they even stirred up divorce. The neighborhood committees had failed to reconcile their marriages four times in the past. During these mediations, I was present, mentioning that every time they borrowed money, the former son-in-law Wang did not deny the mediation of the previous two times, but he lied to claim that the loans had already been paid off after the two mediations. Now I want to recover money from him in court. Participants in mediation are also willing to testify in court, but I do not have any evidence because I have no evidence in my hands. Excuse me: There is no borrowing, indirect evidence alone can determine the relationship between lending?