论文部分内容阅读
《通志·总序》是南宋著名史学家郑樵的一篇重要的史学评论文章,它集中反映了作者的史学观点.对后世的史学理论产生过深远的影响。然而由于郑樵力主编写通史.反对断代为史,因此他在评论《史记》、《汉书》的过程中明显流露出尊马抑班的思想倾向,导致了一些评论的偏颇和失实。本文旨在指出并纠正这些偏颇和失实.说明史学批评必须重视它的公正性和严肃性。
“Annals · General Preface” is an important historiographical essay by Zheng Qiao, a famous historian of the Southern Song Dynasty, which mainly reflects the author’s historical viewpoint. Have a far-reaching impact on future generations of historical theory. However, due to Zheng Qiaoli editor general history. Opposed to the dynasties’ history. Therefore, in the process of commenting on Records of the Historian and Han, he clearly showed the tendency of respecting and restraining classes, which led to some biased and incorrect comments. This article aims to point out and correct these biases and inaccuracies. It shows that historical criticism must pay attention to its impartiality and seriousness.