论文部分内容阅读
前言《全辽文》初名《辽文汇》,它是一部辽代的总集,也是今天掌握的一份当时最全面的直接史料。全面占有材料,在历史研究中是最重要的环节。旧时代的史学家们,提倡过文史配合的办法,刘知几主张:凡为史者,应当在表、志之外,更立一书,收集制册诰令,章表移檄,题为制册表章书,以类相从,犹如志分礼乐、刑法之例。章学诚发展这种说法,倡为“方志之三书议”,称曰“三家之学”:“仿纪、传之体而作志,仿律令、典故之体而作掌故,仿文选、文苑之体而作文征”;彼此配合,相辅而行,强调“阙一不可,合而为一尤不可”。他在修志工作中文践,也取得了有益的经验。《全辽文》也可以算是配合《辽史》的一份资料。在体例上又作了一些改进。
Preface “Full Liao Wen” first name “Liao Wen Hui”, it is a collection of the Liao Dynasty, but also today master a most comprehensive and direct historical materials. Full possession of materials, in the history of the study is the most important part. Historians of the old age, advocating a combination of history and literature, Liu Zhizi claims: For those who are historians, they should set up a separate book, collect books and orders, and move the tables under the title Book table chapter book, with similar phase, like a ritual ritual, the case of criminal law. Zhang Xuecheng development of this argument, advocated “Fang Zhi of the three books,” said saying “three of the school”: “Imitation of discipline, the body of passions and writers, Imitation order, allusions of the body for the sake of the story, Imitation Wen election, Body and writing levy ”; each other, complement each other, emphasizing“ Que may not, together as a particularly unscrupulous. ” He has also gained useful experience in the practice of Chi in Chinese history. “Full Liao Wen” can also be regarded as a “history of Liao” a piece of information. In the system and made some improvements.