论文部分内容阅读
不久之前,中国北京市中级人民法院知识产权審判庭審结的首例商标侵权案——北京巴黎大磨坊食品有限公司诉北京太阳城商场案,是我国经济生活法制化的体现,它在给人们以警示,并引人思考。太阳城商场商标侵权的案由北京巴黎大磨坊食品有限公司(以下简称大磨坊公司)与北京太阳城商场(以下简称太阳城商场)于1992年10月26日签订了一份代销协议,约定:太阳城商场食品部设代销专区,于1992年12月24日起专销大磨坊公司生产的面包,并在专区内的商品标签上标明了“大磨坊”的字样。1993年4月下旬,因某些原因大磨坊公司停止了对太阳城商场的供货,欲就有关情况与商场进行商议。在此期间,该公司业务员却意外地发现,该商场的原大磨坊面包专区内,仍在出售与大磨坊公司生产的面包、外观一样的面包,并且区内依然使用着“大磨坊”字样的商品标签。随后,业务员回公司报告了情况,不久,大磨坊公司又派有关负责人员前往商场再次查看时,情况依然如此。于是,1993年8月17日,一份以北京巴黎大磨坊食品有限公司诉北京太阳城商场侵犯商标事用权的民事起诉状递到了北京市中级人民法院。该院知识产权審判庭受理此案,于1993年10月21日开
Not long ago, the first case of trademark infringement concluded by the Trial Chamber of Intellectual Property of the Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing, China - Beijing Grand Mill Food Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Sun City Mall was a manifestation of the legalization of our economic life. Alert, and lead to thinking. Sun City Mall trademark infringement case Beijing Great Mills Food Co., Ltd. Paris (hereinafter referred to as the Great Mills Company) and Beijing Sun City Mall (hereinafter referred to as Sun City Mall) in October 26, 1992 signed a consignment agreement, the agreement: the sun City Mall Department of Food set up sales area, on December 24, 1992 specializes in the sale of bread produced by the Grand Mills, and in the area of commodity labels marked “big mill” message. In late April 1993, for some reason, the Grand Moulin Company stopped supplying Sun City shopping malls to discuss the situation with the shopping malls. During this period, the clerk of the company unexpectedly found that the original Grand Mirney bakery in the mall was still selling breads and breads the same as Grand Moulin Rouge, and the area was still using “Big Mill” "The words of the product label. Subsequently, the clerk returned to the company reported the situation, and soon, the big mill company and sent the responsible officer to the mall to review again, the situation remains the same. Thus, on August 17, 1993, a civil complaint filed in Beijing Grand Mill Food Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Sun City Armory handed over to Beijing Intermediate People’s Court. The court trial of intellectual property court accepted the case, in October 21, 1993 open