论文部分内容阅读
最近,“山东东平女生被性侵”案不断发酵。媒体报道中的“未成年少女”、“开宝马车的地痞”、“警察称市里打过招呼难办”等字眼,刺激着公众的神经。当事双方的“强势与弱势”与若干起同类事件一样,再次引发标签化思维和法治思维的碰撞。权贵人士违法时利用手中权、囊中财为自己“解套”确有发生,于是,人们痛恨“强势”群体、同情“弱势”群体并产生“为官不正”、“为富不仁”的刻板偏见以及“仇官”、“仇富”心理。但是,离开事实依据和法律界定,简单用“强势”和“弱势”的标签论是非、定轻重,只会动摇法律刚性,损害法制权威。
Recently, “Shandong Dongping female sexual abuse ” case continues to ferment. In the media coverage, “underage girl”, “open the bloody car BMW”, “police said the city played a greeting difficult” and other words to stimulate the public’s nerves. The “strengths and weaknesses” of the two parties, like a number of similar incidents, once again trigger the collision of labeling and rule of law thinking. When powerful people use their rights in violation of laws, they have their own “solution”, so people hate “strong ” groups, sympathize “disadvantaged ” groups and produce “Caring for the rich, ” stereotypes and “hatred ”, “hatred of the rich ” psychology. However, leaving factual basis and legal definition, simply using the label theory of “strength” and “weakness” is right and wrong and will only shake the rigidity of law and undermine the authority of legal system.