论文部分内容阅读
自20世纪90年代末以来,过渡性开放空间的使用已经吸引了越来越多欧洲城市规划师及景观设计师的关注。在一块闲置地被用来修建新建筑之前先用作开放空间,这是利用过渡性景观的一个例子。开放空间的“过渡性”形式似乎不符合对城市景观开发的传统理解,这种理解基于现有的开放空间的保存和长期使用。多变的社会条件、公众影响城市开发的约束作用以及减少的市政预算迫使政府重新思考他们的责任以及他们如何履行这些责任。习惯上,一个城市绿色空间是基于人均量小空间需求而进行开发的,特别要遵循欧洲绿色空间的传统形式与功能。市政研究表明,无论在衰退的城市还是在繁荣的城市,过渡性使用在城市空间规划中正越来越引起关注。过渡性空间的利用似乎能提供应对当前挑战的十分有趣的潜在方法,然而它们在欧洲规划程序中的综合运用似乎与开放空间应是永久性的受保护的理解有矛盾。
The use of transitional open spaces has attracted the attention of more and more European urban planners and landscape architects since the late 1990s. Used as an open space before a piece of land is used to build a new building, an example of a transitional landscape. The “transitional” form of open space does not appear to be consistent with the traditional understanding of urban landscape development based on the preservation and long-term use of the existing open space. Varying social conditions, public restraints on urban development, and reduced municipal budgets compel governments to rethink their responsibilities and how they fulfill these responsibilities. Traditionally, an urban green space has been developed based on the small space per capita demand, in particular to follow the traditional forms and functions of European green space. Municipal studies show that transitional use is gaining more and more attention in urban spatial planning, both in declining cities and in prosperous cities. The use of transitional space seems to provide a potentially interesting and potentially useful solution to current challenges, yet their combined use in European planning processes seems to contradict the open understanding that open space should be permanent.