论文部分内容阅读
由于本世纪四十年代的批判性分析,行政学家们对行政学作为一门学科而存在的信心已经不足,并且行政学本身已失去两次大战之间的连贯性.虽然各种不同的研究方法或研究重点相互间一直在竞争,但是没有一种能成功地赢得这一学科的学者们的普遍承认.没有实现新的综合,也没有新的正统学说来取代旧的正统学说.一般说来,行政学取得的进展在很大程度上是从许多方面,主要是从各种社会科学中,吸取论据、观念和方法而来的;但
Due to the critical analysis of the 1940s, the confidence of administrators in administration as a subject is insufficient and administration itself has lost its coherence between the two wars. Although various studies Methods or research priorities have been competing with each other, but there is no universal acknowledgment of a scholar who successfully won the discipline, no new synthesis, no new orthodoxy to supersede the old orthodoxy. , The progress made in administration has largely come from drawing arguments, ideas and methods from many aspects, mainly from various social sciences; however,