关于《拿来主义》的前4段,很多论者都认为运用了“破立结合”的说理方法。人民教育出版社《教师教学用书》就持这一观点,在该书的“课文研讨”中,这样的论述有三处:“这三个部分‘以破为主’”1“文章的前三个部分‘破中有立’”2“先不谈‘拿来主义’,却大谈‘闭关主义’和‘送去主义’,表面上绕了弯子,实际上‘先破后立’‘破中有立’”3。很多教师也以此为依据进行教学。事实上,这些说法都有待商榷。 As for the first four paragraphs of “Bringing It,” many of the commentators think that they have used the method of “breaking their bonds with others.” People’s Education Press, “Teacher Teaching Book” to hold this view, in the book’s “textual research”, there are three such discourse: “These three parts to break the main ’’ In the first three parts of the article, there is a ”break through“ ”let’s not talk about ’take-out’ first, but we talk about ’tibetanism’ and ’sent-outism’ Broke after the legislature ’’ broken legislation ’’ 3. Many teachers also use this as a basis for teaching. In fact, these statements have yet to be discussed.