论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨心理护理干预在病毒性黄疸性肝炎患者中的应用效果。方法选取攀枝花市第四人民医院2013年10月—2015年10月收治的病毒性黄疸性肝炎患者82例,随机分为对照组和研究组,各41例。对照组患者入院后给予常规护理,研究组患者在对照组基础上给予心理护理干预。比较两组患者人际关系敏感、抑郁、恐惧、精神病性及焦虑症状自评量表(SCL90)评分,护理前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分及治疗依从性。结果护理后,研究组患者人际关系敏感、抑郁、恐惧、精神病性及焦虑SCL90评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。护理前,两组患者SAS评分、SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组患者SAS评分、SDS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组患者用药依从性优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论心理护理干预在病毒性黄疸性肝炎患者中应用效果明显,可有效缓解患者焦虑、抑郁情绪,提升用药依从性,促进患者疾病康复。
Objective To investigate the effect of psychological nursing intervention in patients with viral jaundice hepatitis. Methods Eighty-two patients with viral jaundice hepatitis who were admitted to Panzhihua No.4 People’s Hospital from October 2013 to October 2015 were randomly divided into control group and study group, with 41 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given regular nursing after admission. Patients in the study group were given psychological nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The SCL90 scores, the SAS scores before and after care, the self-rating depression scale (SDS) and the treatment compliance were compared between the two groups in terms of interpersonal sensitivity, depression, fear, psychosis and anxiety symptom scores Sex. Results After nursing, the scores of SCL90 in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in SAS score and SDS score between the two groups (P> 0.05). After nursing, SAS score and SDS score of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P <0.05). Study group patients medication compliance than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Psychological nursing intervention in patients with viral jaundice has obvious effect, which can effectively relieve the anxiety and depression of patients, improve the compliance of medication and promote the rehabilitation of patients.