论文部分内容阅读
案情简介2006年下半年至2008年4月,时任某市工商局商广科科长的黄某负责企业驰名商标认定工作,在明知有企业通过虚假诉讼方式进行驰名商标认定的情况下,仍为商标代理商骆某联系辖内企业参与驰名商标认定。2007年至2008年,经过骆某的具体操作,该市辖内有某控股集团公司等11家企业的商标先后被外地中级人民法院认定为驰名商标。其中在诉讼所需的证明材料中,某控股集团公司的商标不符合商标须持续使用三年的条件,而黄某出具了该商标已使用三年的证明。嗣后,在11家企业向市工商局商广科提交上述相关中级人民法院的判决书和生效证明书用以申报政府特别奖过程中,黄某又
Brief introduction of the case From the second half of 2006 to April 2008, Hwang, who served as the head of the Commercial and Commercial Bureau of Guangshang Branch of a city at the time, was responsible for the recognition of well-known trademarks of enterprises. In the case that a well-known trademark was affirmed by a fake lawsuit, For the trademark agent Luo involved in the jurisdiction of enterprises involved in well-known trademarks identified. From 2007 to 2008, after the specific operation of Luo Mou, the trademark of 11 enterprises including a holding group company in the municipality has been recognized as a well-known trademark by a foreign Intermediate People’s Court. Among the evidence required in the litigation, the trademark of a holding group company did not meet the conditions for the trademark to be continuously used for three years, and Hwang issued a certificate that the trademark has been used for three years. Subsequently, in 11 enterprises submitted to the Municipal Industrial and Commercial Bureau Guang Guangke the relevant Intermediate People’s Court verdict and certificate of entry to declare the government special award process, Hwang Mou