修辞作为一种法律论证方法,目的在于增强判决的可接受性,在帮助法官实现或然性问题的论证方面发挥着不可替代的作用。具体而言,对于一个特定的判决,法官不仅需要证成其事实叙事,还要证成其法律适用,有时,还需要借助于情感手段来进一步说服听众,在这些论证场景下,都需要借助于修辞方法。与其他领域修辞方法适用的情形有所不同,作为法律论证方法的修辞的运用,必须严格限定在法律的限度之内,从而在特定问题上实现应有的确定性。 As a legal argumentation method, rhetoric aims at enhancing the acceptability of judgments and playing an irreplaceable role in helping judges to prove the probabilistic issues. Specifically, for a particular judgment, judges not only need to justify their factual narrative, but also justify their application of the law. In some cases, they also need to further persuade the audience by means of emotional means. In these scenarios, they need assistance Rhetorical methods. Different from the rhetorical methods applied in other fields, the rhetoric used as the method of legal argumentation must be strictly limited to the limits of the law so as to achieve the due certainty on specific issues.