论文部分内容阅读
目的比较上消化道出血急诊内镜检查及止血的即刻止血率、再出血发生率及住院死亡率.方法上消化道出血486例,分为两组,A组为1991年底以前出血者(n=209),B组为1992年以后出血者(n=277).两组大出血发生率无显著差别.B组出血后24h内行急诊检查者明显多于A组(P<001).结果B组急性胃粘膜损伤出血(97%)多于A组(53%),原因不明出血者(43%)少于A组(96%).经过治疗,B组出血控制率(944%)高于A组(603%),再出血率(94%)低于A组(158%),住院死亡率(28%)低于A组(101%).结论急诊内镜检查可提高出血病因诊断率,配合有效的止血措施,可提高止血率和降低住院死亡率
Objective To compare the immediate hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate and in-hospital mortality rate of emergency endoscopy and hemostasis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods 486 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, divided into two groups, group A bleeding before the end of 1991 (n = 209), group B bleeding after 1992 (n = 277). No significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding between the two groups. The number of emergency examinations within 24 hours after bleeding in group B was significantly more than that in group A (P <001). Results Acute gastric mucosal injury in group B was more severe (97%) than in group A (5.3%), and the cause of unidentified hemorrhage (43%) was less than that in group A (96%). After treatment, the bleeding control rate (944%) in group B was higher than that in group A (603%), the rate of rebleeding was lower (94%) than that in group A (158%), 8%) than in group A (101%). Conclusion Emergency endoscopy can improve the diagnosis of hemorrhage etiology, with effective measures to stop bleeding can increase the rate of hemostasis and reduce hospital mortality