论文部分内容阅读
目的:对于腹腔镜下保守手术和经阴道内镜进行手术诊治宫外孕两种方式进行对比。方法:使用回顾性方法对80位患有宫外孕病人进行诊治,分成保守组以及实验组,对比两组病人术后恢复时间以及治疗效果。结果:实验组病人在术中出血量、伤口恢复时间以及术后恢复时间明显低于保守组,其输卵管畅通率以及宫内妊娠率大于保守组,上述差异均有统计学意义。结论:使用经阴道内镜进行手术诊治宫外孕效果明显好于腹腔镜下保守手术治疗方式,并且有手术伤害性小、恢复快等优点,值得在临床当中广泛使用。
Objective: To compare laparoscopic conservative surgery and transvaginal endoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Eighty patients with ectopic pregnancy were treated by retrospective method. The patients were divided into conservative group and experimental group. The recovery time and therapeutic effect were compared between the two groups. Results: The blood loss, wound recovery time and postoperative recovery time were significantly lower in the experimental group than those in the conservative group. The tubal unobstructed rate and intrauterine pregnancy rate were higher than those in the conservative group. The above differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of transvaginal endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy are much better than those of laparoscopic conservative surgery, and have the advantages of less invasiveness and quick recovery. It is worth widely used in clinical practice.