论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察和分析不同治疗方式临床治疗宫颈糜烂患者后的临床医疗效果。方法:选择我院2013年2月至2014年2月收治的100例慢性宫颈糜烂患者为研究对象,将其随机分为采用Co2激光进行治疗的实验组(50例)与采用高频电刀环切术进行治疗的对照组(50例),分析与研究试验对象的临床医疗情况,并且进行综合疗效评定。结果:通过比较实验组与对照组间的临床治疗效果,实验组当中,轻、中度宫颈糜烂患者一次性治疗的总有效率达94.5%,重度宫颈糜烂患者一次性治疗的总有效率为72.3%。对照组当中,轻、中度宫颈糜烂患者一次性治疗的总有效率为75.5%,重度宫颈糜烂患者一次性治疗的总有效率为93.5%。结论:Co2激光治疗法对于轻、中度宫颈糜烂患者具有很好的临床医疗效果,高频电刀环切术在治疗重度宫颈糜烂的过程中效果显著,应优先选择,两种治疗方式具备各自的优缺点,应合理选择。
Objective: To observe and analyze the clinical effect of different treatment methods in clinical treatment of patients with cervical erosion. Methods: A total of 100 patients with chronic cervical erosion treated in our hospital from February 2013 to February 2014 were selected and randomly divided into experimental group (50 cases) treated with Co2 laser, The control group (50 cases) treated by excision, analyzed and studied the clinical medical condition of the test subjects, and evaluated the comprehensive efficacy. Results: By comparing the clinical treatment effect between the experimental group and the control group, the total effective rate of one-off treatment in patients with mild and moderate cervical erosion was 94.5% in the experimental group, and the total effective rate in one-time treatment of severe cervical erosion patients was 72.3 %. In the control group, the total effective rate of one-off treatment for patients with mild and moderate cervical erosion was 75.5%, and the total effective rate of one-off treatment for patients with severe cervical erosion was 93.5%. Conclusion: Co2 laser treatment for patients with mild to moderate cervical erosion has a good clinical effect, high frequency electrosurgical excision in the treatment of severe cervical erosion in the process of significant effect, should be given priority, the two treatment methods have their own The advantages and disadvantages, should be a reasonable choice.