论文部分内容阅读
本文试图考察日本近代的过渡刑律《新律纲领》与《改定律例》在继受中国传统律例之余,面对西方法律思潮,如何发展演变的问题。通过对“断罪无正条”与“不应为”的梳理分析,可以发现,《新律纲领》此两条基本沿袭清律,《改定律例》的“断罪无正条”条例则试图将原来两条融合为一,以“无正条”之名,取原“不应为”之立法特质,通过轻刑化限制比附推理所依据情理的不确定之弊,并赋予司法量刑上的一定弹性,以减少比附的适用。但由于《新律纲领》与《改定律例》并存适用,故律无正条时,重罪案件仍保留了由中央议决之旧律特色,在特定案件的处理中,显示出明治政府在维新的同时,专权残酷的另一面。
This article attempts to examine the issue of how to develop and evolve the “New Law Program” and “Restructuring Laws” of the transitional criminal law in Japan while following the traditional Chinese laws and regulations. Through the combing analysis of “no crime is not the regular” and “should not be”, we can find that the two basic rules of “new law program” “Ordinance tries to merge the original two into one, with ” no “in the name of the original ” should not “of the legislative traits, by light punishment to limit than the reasoning based on the reasoning of uncertainty The disadvantages, and give the sentencing on the judiciary some flexibility to reduce the application of the attached. However, because of the coexistence of ”new law program“ and ”law changing", when the law is not correct, the felony crime still retains the old legal characteristic decided by the central government. In the handling of specific cases, At the same time, the cruel side of the franchise.