论文部分内容阅读
文章依据C100指数的理念与其2013年的实验数据,结合中国哲学学科在学术生产实践活动中的具体情况,从期刊、科研机构和作者以及研究方向四个维度,对中国哲学学科的学术生产力状况进行分析,得出了哲学学科的学术生产力水平较高、学术影响力较大、学术生产力版图总体稳定但存在着发生变化的现实可能性、学术生产力发展前景总体向好的基本判断。
Based on the concept of C100 index and its 2013 experimental data, combining with the concrete conditions of Chinese philosophy disciplines in academic production practice activities, this paper analyzes the academic productivity of Chinese philosophy disciplines from the four dimensions of periodicals, research institutes and authors as well as research direction It is concluded that the philosophical disciplines have a relatively high level of academic productivity, a high academic influence, a generally stable academic productivity landscape, but there is a real possibility of change and an overall good judgment of the development prospects of academic productivity.