论文部分内容阅读
目的评价“医学科研项目实施过程评价指标体系”的可靠性和真实性。方法对某医学科研基金资助的在研项目应用已建立的“实施过程评价指标体系”进行评价,同时开展专家组评价。以专家组评分为“金标准”,比较指标体系评分与专家组评分的异同。结果各二级指标的克朗巴哈α系数均达到0．8。26项三级指标的得分与所属二级指标得分的相关系数均大于0．5。、指标体系评分与专家组评分的相关系数为0．713。对两种评价方法作配对资料的关联性分析,两种评价方法具有关联性,Kappa值和一致率较高。结论实施过程评价指标体系具有较高的可靠性和真实性。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and authenticity of “Evaluation Index System of Medical Scientific Research Project Implementation Process”. Methods Applying the established “Evaluation Index System of Implementation Process” to the research project funded by a medical research fund, we carry out the evaluation of the expert group. Expert group rating as “gold standard”, comparing the index system score and expert group score similarities and differences. Results The correlation coefficient between the scores of all three levels of Cronbach α coefficients of 0.8.26 and those of the secondary indicators was greater than 0.5. The correlation coefficient between the index system score and the expert group score was 0.713. The correlation between the two evaluation methods for paired data analysis, the two evaluation methods are related, Kappa value and consistency rate higher. Conclusion The implementation process evaluation index system has high reliability and authenticity.