【摘 要】
：
According to the official website of China's National Equities Exchange and Quotations, the Beijing Stock Exchange formally came into being on September 3. The
论文部分内容阅读
According to the official website of China\'s National Equities Exchange and Quotations, the Beijing Stock Exchange formally came into being on September 3. The Beijing bourse may provide a fundraising avenue with easier listing rules closer to home, stockbrokers said.
其他文献
刑法领域内的合宪性解释已经成为刑法学与宪法学在新时代的共同追求,但是刑法学的关注尚停留于理念宣导,宪法学的关注则主要以分则具体问题为中心,刑法教义学本身很少接受合宪性检视。实际上,合宪性检视对刑法教义学的合理化与合法化均具有重要意义。我国《刑法》第29条第2款规定的教唆犯独立性与从属性之争,在教义学上陷入了多极对峙、自说自话或者将立法者作为挡箭牌的诸多困境。如果引入合宪性的价值视角重新审视围绕该款规定的各种解释结论,可以发现宪法中平等原则和比例原则的指导意义,有助于疏解流于智识之争的该学理僵局。刑法教义学
Absorbed by the appreciation of illustration, 11-year-old Zhang Duoduo is one of the children joining their parents at the Bologna Illustrators Exhibition China
日本京都学派东洋史家宫崎市定在《东洋的朴素主义民族与文明主义社会》《中国史》中均提出“五霸皆夷狄论”,立论依据为五霸之国未遵循同姓不婚、出身于异民族、不服从周王朝统治、语言交流有碍、文化习俗不同等。若依照上述区别华夷之标准,在进行史料比对和史实核查后发现,齐桓公、晋文公并非夷狄,吴王阖闾或夫差、越王勾践位居华夷之间,楚庄王虽自称夷狄但有其特殊语境。因此,“五霸皆夷狄”之说并不成立。究其根本,这是宫崎为了论证“朴素主义民族”对“文明主义社会”的挑战和征服,进而配合日本侵华国策而有意构建的反事实假说,这一假说
《辽史》和《契丹国志》的《后妃传》既复制中原王朝正史的叙述模式,又取资于本族神话传说、摩尼教和佛教,其历史书写呈现文化与族群多元的特征,塑造统治者或精英群体期待的
As the new semester started on September 1, Liu Jing, mother of a primary school pupil in Beijing, heaved a sigh of relief since her kid can now arrive at schoo
民法之精神是由民法基本原则所构成的价值统一体,是对自由、平等、公正、法治、诚信等社会主义核心价值观的集中反映.民法基本原则是贯穿民事立法、司法、守法各环节的基本价
昭和初年的日本,弥漫在担心失去中国东北殖民权益的所谓“满蒙危机”中.日本陆军对于如何解决这一“危机”存在两种构想,一种是后来被关东军实施的在中国东北制造事端,即众所
At the 10th meeting of the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs on August 17, President Xi Jinping, also General Secretary of the Communist Part
’At this hour,American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq,to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger...We come to Iraq with respect for its citizens,for their great civilization and for the
“财物”包括财产性利益,这已成共识,问题是如何对其作具体理解。劳务本身并非财产性利益,只有利用了有偿劳务却最终逃避支付相应对价的行为,才属于财产性利益。刑法中的“财物”应该和“财产”作同一理解,原则上应为有经济价值的物,具有主观情感价值的物在例外场合也可能成为“财物”。法律经济财产说虽试图折中,却会导致处罚漏洞和处罚不均衡。财产概念中新视角的导入有启发价值,对(修正的)经济财产说的各种质疑也不乏值得倾听之处。不过,在综合考虑客观与主观、人与物、此财产罪与彼财产罪等各种因素之后,仍有必要坚持(修正的)经济财