论文部分内容阅读
口供作为一种证明案件事实的证据,具有其他六种法定证据所无法超越的优势,但口供的特点又导致翻供现象在刑事诉讼过程中时有发生,翻供现象在佘祥林、赵作海等错案曝光之后,日益引起司法实践部门的重视。2010年5月,两高三部出台了“两个证据”规定,在新的规定下如何正确对待翻供问题,才能既发挥口供的作用以查明案件事实、惩罚犯罪,又保障人权、节约司法资源、实现诉讼效益?笔者结合自己在司法实践中总结的部分感性认识和经验,分析研究刑事诉讼领域的关于证据的理论,借鉴他人的研究成果,对于“两个证据”规定后翻供问题的对策进行了深入的研究和探讨,并提出在立法和制度方面的建议。
As evidence of the facts of the case, the confession has the advantage that other six kinds of statutory evidence can not be surpassed. However, the characteristics of confession cause the phenomenon of confession to occur from time to time in criminal proceedings. After the exposure of such cases as She Xianglin and Zhao Zuohai, It has aroused more and more attention of judicial practice department. In May 2010, the two high schools and three ministries promulgated the “two evidences” stipulating that under the new stipulations, how to correctly treat the issue of turning over to provide evidence can not only serve as an example of the facts of the case, punish the crimes, but also safeguard human rights and save Judicial resources, to achieve litigation benefits? Author combined with their own part of the judicial practice in the perception and experience of perceptual analysis of criminal prosecution in the field of evidence on the theory, learn from the research results of others, for the Problems and countermeasures conducted in-depth study and discussion, and put forward the legislative and institutional proposals.