论文部分内容阅读
在韩国开展的关于社会服务供给的讨论不是侧重于社会服务本身的功能和作用,而是注重社会服务传递方式的效率和创造新就业岗位等短期效果。如果说社会服务供给的制度化是把社会保障体系改变为具有收入和服务保障的两个轴心的结构,那么这两个轴心就像《社会保障基本法》所提出的实现同一目标的两种方法的差异。社会服务供给不是单纯把生产出来的服务进行传送的技术过程,而是包括生产服务的资源、生产和传送服务、规则等所有服务供给过程。若把社会服务供给体系视为服务供给的所有过程,那么应该考虑把制度中被排除的领域吸纳进来。为了把制度外的因素纳入到社会服务供给过程,需要把一部分社会经济领域供给体系的构成要素纳入到制度内部或者建立与社会福利制度相区别的强化社区福利供给体系的政策。增强社会企业、合作组织及其他社会经济领域行为主体的力量也是建设以社区为基础的社会服务供给体系的政策选择之一。
The discussion on social service provision in South Korea focuses not on the function and role of social services but on the short-term effects such as the efficiency of social service delivery and the creation of new jobs. If the institutionalization of the provision of social services changes the social security system into a two-axis structure with revenue and service guarantees, then the two axes are like the two proposed by the Basic Law for Social Security to achieve the same goal Differences in methods. The social service supply is not a technical process of simply delivering the produced service, but includes all the service provisioning processes such as production service resources, production and delivery services, rules and the like. If we regard the social service supply system as the whole process of service supply, we should consider including the excluded areas in the system. In order to integrate the factors outside the system into the social service supply process, some of the components of the supply system of the social economy need to be incorporated into the system or the policy of strengthening the community welfare supply system that is different from the social welfare system needs to be established. Enhancing the power of social actors, cooperative organizations and other actors in the social and economic fields is also one of the policy options for building a community-based social service delivery system.