论文部分内容阅读
目的比较小儿包茎和包皮过长分别采用包皮环扎法与包皮环切术的疗效。方法 174例包茎和包皮过长患儿按手术方式分为包皮环扎组85例与包皮环切组89例,观察两组手术时间、伤口愈合时间、术后并发症及术后外观情况。结果包皮环扎组手术时间、术后并发症发生率低于包皮环切组,外观良好率高于包皮环切组,术后愈合时间长于包皮环切组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论包皮环扎法治疗小儿包茎和包皮过长手术时间短、并发症少、创缘整齐美观,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the curative effect of circumcision and circumcision in children with phimosis and prepuce. Methods 174 cases of phimosis and prepuce were divided into 85 cases of circumcision group and 89 cases of circumcision group according to operation method. The operation time, wound healing time, postoperative complications and postoperative appearance of the two groups were observed. Results The operative time and the incidence of postoperative complications in the circumcision group were lower than those in the circumcision group, and the good appearance rate was higher in the circumcision group than in the circumcision group. The healing time in the circumcision group was longer than that in the circumcision group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The method of circumcision for phimosis and prepuce in children with short operation time, less complications, wound margin neat and beautiful, is worth clinical promotion.