论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨犯罪青少年生活方式与家庭环境的关系,为预防青少年犯罪提供参考依据。方法采用病例对照研究方法对在陕西省青少年犯罪管理所整群抽取的302名男性犯罪青少年和西安市城乡2所中学分层整群抽取的初二到高一年级296名男生进行问卷调查。结果犯罪青少年的社交和家庭矛盾性、娱乐性得分分别为(8.84±2.02)、(4.53±1.92)、(4.94±1.58)分,分别高于中学生的(8.01±2.44)、(3.72±2.04)、(4.16±2.04)分(均P=0.000);饮食、药物、锻炼、闲暇、家庭亲密度、知识性、控制性得分分别为(6.77±2.21)、(6.94±2.86)、(6.17±2.38)、(6.09±2.13)、(5.18±1.96)、(2.81±1.43)、(2.91±1.53)分,分别低于中学生的(8.83±2.14)、(10.88±2.23)、(8.36±2.19)、(7.95±2.23)、(5.95±2.31)、(3.47±1.97)、(3.97±2.09)分(均P=0.000);犯罪青少年生活方式各维度与家庭环境各维度存在多项相关关系(r=-0.208～0.374);家庭亲密度、知识性、组织性、控制性对生活方式因子具有多项正向预测作用(β’=0.116～0.253,P=0.000～0.005),家庭矛盾性、娱乐性对药物具有负向预测作用(β’=-0.126,P=0.002;β’=-0.272,P=0.000),对社交具有正向预测作用(β’=0.099,P=0.020;β’=0.206,P=0.000)。结论犯罪青少年生活方式较不健康,家庭环境较差,家庭环境对其生活方式有明显影响。
Objective To explore the relationship between the criminal lifestyle of adolescents and family environment and to provide reference for preventing juvenile delinquency. Methods A case-control study was conducted to investigate the relationship between 302 male criminals who were collected by Shaanxi Youth Juvenile Criminology Center and 296 boys from the second to the first grade in the middle school in two urban and rural areas of Xi’an. Results The scores of social and family conflict and entertaining of criminals were (8.84 ± 2.02), (4.53 ± 1.92) and (4.94 ± 1.58) points respectively, higher than that of middle school students (8.01 ± 2.44) and (3.72 ± 2.04) (6.77 ± 2.21), (6.94 ± 2.86) and (6.17 ± 2.38), respectively (all P = 0.000). The scores of diet, medicine, exercise, leisure, family intimacy, ), (6.09 ± 2.13), (5.18 ± 1.96), (2.81 ± 1.43) and (2.91 ± 1.53) points lower than that of the middle school students (8.83 ± 2.14), (10.88 ± 2.23) and (8.36 ± 2.19) (7.95 ± 2.23), (5.95 ± 2.31), (3.47 ± 1.97) and (3.97 ± 2.09) (all P = 0.000). There was a correlation between dimensions of family life and all dimensions of lifestyle of criminal delinquency (r = -0.208 ~ 0.374). Family intimacy, knowledge, organization and control had positive predictive effects on life style factors (β ’= 0.116 ~ 0.253, P = 0.000 ~ 0.005) (Β ’= - 0.126, P = 0.002; β’ = - 0.272, P = 0.000), and had a positive predictive value for social interaction (β ’= 0.099, P = 0.020; , P = 0.000). Conclusion Criminal lifestyle is less healthy, family environment is worse, family environment has a significant impact on their way of life.