结构主义叙事理论在对文本进行语法分析时,将修辞当成语法的附属物。人们渐渐开始怀疑,文学文本的组织是否有一定可还原的规律性,叙事修辞是否真的来源于语法框架?实际上叙事的过程就是一个转义修辞的过程,叙事话语的生成并非源于一个坚固的、本义的、语法的系统,而是在活生生的语言环境中进行的创造。只有厘清叙事语法中的“本义—转义”关系以及叙事语法和叙事修辞之间的关系,才能展示出叙事修辞在话语生成中的重要意义。 Structuralist narrative theory uses grammatical rhetoric as an adjunct to grammatical analysis of texts. People gradually began to wonder whether the organization of literary texts had some regularity that could be restored. Is the narrative rhetoric really derived from the grammar frame? Actually, the process of narration is a process of escaping rhetoric. The generation of narrative discourse does not originate from a strong The original, grammatical system, but in a living language environment for the creation. Only by clarifying the relationship of “original meaning - escaping ” and the relationship between narrative grammar and narrative rhetoric in narrative grammar can we show the significance of narrative rhetoric in discourse generation.