论文部分内容阅读
目的 :探讨肠造口术后切口愈合 ,防止粪便污染及感染的措施。方法 :将 76例肠造口术后病员随机分为两组 ,一组(观察组 ) 4 0例 ,使用人工肛门碗 ;另一组 (对照组 ) 36例 ,使用人工肛袋 ,对术后伤口感染 ,切口一期愈合及粪便污染情况进行系统观察对比。结果 :两组切口感染和一期愈合有显著差异 (P <0 0 5 ) ;两组粪便污染情况有显著性差异 (P <0 0 0 1)。结论 :肠造口术后使用人工肛门碗优于人工肛袋
Objective : To explore the healing of wound healing after enterocolostomy and prevent fecal contamination and infection. Methods: 76 cases of enterostomies were randomly divided into two groups, one group (observation group) 40 cases, using an artificial anal bowl; the other group (control group) 36 cases, using artificial anal pocket, after surgery Wound infection, incision primary healing and fecal contamination were systematically observed. Results: There was a significant difference in wound infection and primary healing between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in fecal contamination between the two groups (P <0 0 01). Conclusion : Artificial anal bowl is better than artificial anal pocket after enteroostomy