论文部分内容阅读
我国大学英语学习者(CCEFLL)在议论语篇和言语行为中使用模糊限制语的类符总量明显少于本族语者(NS),总体频率显著低于后者。在议论语篇中,CCEFLL使用认知副词的频率稍高于NS,而后者使用认知情态助动词、动词、形容词和名词的频率明显高于前者;在言语行为中,CCEFLL使用程度变动语的频率和比例均明显高于NS,但后者使用范围变动语、直接缓和语和间接缓和语的频率和比例均明显高于前者。CCEFLL模糊限制语习得的发展特征较为复杂。首先,随着英语水平的提高,CCEFLL使用模糊限制语的类符总量在增加,但总体频率在减少;其次,CCEFLL使用各类模糊限制语的能力与其英语水平之间的关系呈现多元化发展趋势。影响CCEFLL习得和得体使用模糊限制语的主要因素有五个,即模糊限制语的复杂属性、中英学术文化差异、汉语负迁移、语言能力和学术写作指导严重缺位。我们认为要解决CCEFLL模糊限制语习得中存在的主要问题,需重点做好三方面工作:提高意识、正确指导和提高语言能力。
The total number of classifiers used by Chinese college English learners (CCEFLL) in heuristic discourse and speech acts was significantly less than that of native speakers (NS), with the overall frequency significantly lower than the latter. In the discourse discourse, CCEFLL used cognitive adverbs slightly more frequently than NS, while the latter used cognitive modal verbs, verbs, adjectives and nouns more frequently than verbal modus operandi. The frequency of CCEFLL use-changing words in speech acts And the proportion were significantly higher than the NS, but the latter use the scope of change language, the direct moderation and indirect moderation frequency and the proportion were significantly higher than the former. The developmental characteristics of CCEFLL hedges are more complicated. First, as the level of English improves, the total number of CCEFLL use of hedges is increasing, but the overall frequency is decreasing. Second, the relationship between CCEFLL’s ability to use various hedges and its English proficiency is diversified trend. There are five main factors that affect the CCEFLL acquisition and the proper use of hedges. These are the complex properties of hedges. There is a serious lack of guidance in Sino-British academic culture, negative Chinese transfer, language ability and academic writing. We think that in order to solve the main problems existing in the acquisition of hedges in CCEFLL, we should focus on three aspects: raising awareness, correctly guiding and improving language ability.