论文部分内容阅读
随着商业方法创新对于市场主体获得竞争优势发挥出越来越重要的作用,赋予商业方法可专利性的需求日益强烈,但传统专利权制度认为商业方法不在可专利主题范围内,由此引发了商业方法可专利性例外之争。本文通过简要回顾商业方法例外这一问题的缘起和发展,同时追本溯源,从实现知识产权合理性理论的视角以及对该问题具有深远影响的案例出发,分析证明了商业方法应当具有可专利性的观点。望借此文抛砖引玉厘清争议,促进我国专利权制度的不断完善。
As business method innovation plays an increasingly important role for market players gaining a competitive advantage and the need for patentability of business methods is growing, the traditional patent system does not consider business methods within the patentable subject matter, Commercial method patentable exception dispute. By briefly reviewing the origin and development of the commercial method exception and at the same time pursuing traceability, from the perspective of realizing the theory of rationality of intellectual property and the case that has far-reaching impact on the issue, this paper analyzes and proves that the commercial method should be patentable the opinion of. We hope this article can help clarify the controversy and promote the continuous improvement of the patent system in our country.