论文部分内容阅读
在判断单位中自然人的行为是构成自然人犯罪还是构成单位犯罪时,首先要考虑的是,自然人意志是否上升为了单位意志,当单位犯意存在时,才能肯定单位犯罪的成立。对单位犯意的探索,应始终围绕着“单位成员对单位活动性质相对独立的决策权”这一主线,只有合法地行使该权力做出的决定,才能上升为单位的犯意。具体而言,单位犯意的形成形式可以分为如下两种:(1)经对单位活动性质有相对独立决策权的部门或个人在权限范围内决定,是否具有该权力及其权限范围以具体的职能划分为判断标准;(2)单位成员经对单位活动性质有相对独立决策权的部门或个人同意做出的决定。
When judging whether a natural person’s behavior constitutes a natural person’s crime or a unit crime, the first thing to consider is whether or not the will of the natural person has risen to the will of the unit. Only when the unit is guilty of intent can the affirmation of the unit crime be affirmed. Introverted exploration of units should always focus on the theme of “the decision-making power of unit members on the independent decision-making power of unit activities”, and only the decisions made by exercising the power legally can rise to the unit’s guilty. Specifically, the forms of the unit’s intent can be divided into the following two types: (1) The department or individual who has relatively independent decision-making power over the nature of the unit activity decides within the limits of authority whether or not it has the right and the scope of its authority to be specific Functions are divided into criteria; (2) The unit members by the nature of the unit activities have relatively independent decision-making authority or individual decision to agree.