论文部分内容阅读
在这场旷日持久的价值本质论争中,无论以李德顺先生为代表的主客关系价值论,还是以赖金良先生为代表的“人道价值”论,都处于不断深化和发展当中,且在某种意义上正逐渐合流。主张主客关系论的并不反对人道价值的确立,只不过在他们看来人道标准就是满足人各种现实的需要;主张“人道价值”论的也不全然反对主客体关系价值的存在,而只反对把人理解成纯粹经验的存在,希望从人本身树立起能够代表人类尊严的超经验的价值标准。因此,当代哲学价值论的分歧实质不在于是否同意主客体关系的思维方式,而在于如何理解和把握人的主体性,它昭示着未来哲学价值论研究的德性化趋势。
In this protracted debate on the nature of value, both the theory of the subject-object relationship represented by Mr. Li Deshun and the theory of “humanitarian value” represented by Mr. Lai Jinliang are constantly deepening and developing, and in a sense, Is gradually merging. Advocating the theory of the relationship between subject and object does not oppose the establishment of humane values, but in their view, humane standards are to meet people’s various real needs; advocating “humanitarian value” theory does not completely oppose the existence of the relationship between the subject and object value, but only Opposition to the understanding of human beings as purely experiential, hoping to establish from human beings the value of super-experience that can represent human dignity. Therefore, the essence of the disagreement of contemporary philosophical axiology lies not in whether or not to agree with the mode of thinking of the relationship between subject and object, but rather in how to understand and grasp the subjectivity of human beings. It shows the trend toward the de-characterization of the study of philosophical value in the future.