论文部分内容阅读
近期,南方都市报披露《深圳市城市更新条例》“内部”征求意见稿明确,如果不同意签署搬迁补偿协议的产权人比例不超过5%,则可以向政府申请,由政府出面“征收”或“强制售卖”该5%的物业,随后多家媒体对此事进行了分析报道,媒体几乎一边倒地质疑这种做法,归纳起来,其质疑的理由不外乎以下三点:1、“强制征收”违反上位法,不管是基于物权法的规定,还是基于国务院《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》的规定,征收不动产必须基于公共利益的需要,由于市场主体实施的旧改都涉及商业利益,
Recently, Nanfang Dushi Bao disclosed “Shenzhen City Renewal Ordinance” “Internal ” draft for solicitation is clear, if you do not agree to sign the relocation compensation agreement does not exceed 5% of the proportion of owners, you can apply to the government by the government to come forward Levy “or ” mandatory sale "the 5% of the property, followed by a number of media analysis of the incident reported that the media almost one-sidedly questioned this approach, sum up, the reason for its challenge is nothing more than the following three points : 1. Compulsory levying violates the upper-level law. Whether it is based on the provisions of Real Right Law or the Regulations of the State Council on House Expropriation and Compensation on State-owned Land, the requisition of real estate must be based on the public interest and due to the implementation of Old change all involves commercial interests,