论文部分内容阅读
对于判决书中是否应该公布少数人意见,两大法系相异的作法以及相关的学术争论对我国有可资借鉴之处。在我国,公布少数人意见有较大的现实意义可以克服合议庭评议过程中的“合而不议”和流于形式化,有助于强化法官的责任制,增强法院审判活动的公开性和透明度,提高司法的权威和公信力。在修改三大诉讼法时,应该明确规定判决书中公布少数人意见时所应该注意的问题。
Whether the judgments should announce the opinions of a few people or not, the two different legal systems and related academic controversies have some reference to our country. In our country, the publication of a few people’s views has a greater practical significance to overcome the “unanimity” in the process of collegial review and formality, which can help to strengthen the accountability of judges and enhance the openness and transparency of court trial activities , Improve the authority and credibility of the judiciary. When amending the three major procedural laws, it should clearly stipulate the issues that should be paid attention to when publishing the opinions of the minority from the verdict.