论文部分内容阅读
匈牙利、波兰和捷克斯洛伐克转换过程的回顾霍尔格·施密丁(Holger Schmiediny)(基尔,经济研究所)关于渐进主义或休克疗法的报告论述的基础是,尽管不应忘记计划经济的绝对无效率,但这种经济制度曾是协调全面分工的一种手段。取消这种机制,特别在“大型组织”方面,导致了经济效果严重下降,从中长期看只能由新企业来弥补这种下降。即使制度转换的经济政策管理处在“最佳”状况下,也存在这种不对称现象。个人和小团体能够较好地经受得起他们所熟悉的环境的变化。
Review of the conversion process in Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia Holger Schmiediny (Kiel, Institute of Economic Research) The reportations on gradualism or shock therapy are based on the argument that although absolute planning economy should not be forgotten Inefficient, but this economic system was once a means of coordinating a full division of labor. The abolishment of such a mechanism, especially in terms of “large organizations,” led to a serious economic decline, which would only be compensated by the new enterprises in the medium to long term. This asymmetry exists even under the “best” conditions of economic policy management under system transformation. Individuals and small groups are better able to withstand the changes that they are familiar with.