论文部分内容阅读
贵刊2003年第12期刊发的《这起事故由谁负责赔偿》一文,笔者仔细阅读之后,对文中的赔偿责任划分,认为尚有商榷之处。现将笔者浅见陈述于后,若有不妥甚至舛误,敬请广大同仁和大方之家赐教。首先,依据该文的分析,这既不是一起道路交通事故,也不是一起农机事故,假设分析正确,就不能适用《道路交通事故处理办法》第44条规定,让机手李某负担10个月的平均生活费的赔偿责任,因为只有道路交通事故才能适用《道路交通事故处理办法》。从执法权限看,农
Published in the twelfth issue of 2003, “Who is responsible for this accident compensation,” a text, the author read carefully after the text of the division of liability, that there is still open to question. I now see the superficial statement in the future, if there is any mistake or even mistakes, please my colleagues and generous family enlightenment. First of all, based on the analysis of this paper, it is neither a road accident nor a farm machinery accident. Assuming the analysis is correct, Article 44 of the “Measures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents” can not be applied to allow the driver Lee to bear 10 months Of the average living expenses of the liability, because only road traffic accidents in order to apply “Road Traffic Accident Measures.” From the perspective of law enforcement authority, agriculture