论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析与对比超声和钼靶X线诊断乳腺癌的作用。方法:抽选2013年1月—2015年6月期间来我院就诊的160例乳腺肿块患者,先后进行超声和钼靶X线检查,对比与观察两种诊断方法的临床诊断结果。结果:在钼靶X线临床诊断过程中,患者的影像资料表现不一,而在超声诊断过程中,患者的影像资料表现较为多样化,且钼靶X线的灵敏度、特异度与诊断符合率分别是82.2%、80.0%、81.3%,超声检查分别是86.7%、80.0%、83.8%,无明显差异性(P>0.05)。结论:超声和钼靶X线诊断乳腺癌的作用差异性不明显,均能够提高患者的诊断符合率。
Objective: To analyze and compare the role of ultrasound and mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 160 breast masses from January 2013 to June 2015 were enrolled in this study. Ultrasound and mammography were performed successively to compare and observe the clinical diagnosis results of the two diagnostic methods. Results: During the clinical diagnosis of molybdenum target X-ray, the imaging data of patients showed different performance. In the process of ultrasonic diagnosis, the imaging data of patients showed more diversified, and the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate (82.2%, 80.0% and 81.3% respectively). The ultrasonography was 86.7%, 80.0% and 83.8% respectively, with no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: There is no obvious difference in the role of ultrasound and mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer, both of which can improve the diagnostic accuracy of the patients.