论文部分内容阅读
本文比较了être+及物动词的过去分词和被动意义的代动词这两种结构,从三个方面,即施动者补语能否表达、能否使用tout(e)(es)seul(e)(es)表示强调、体态表达的区别,说明两者在被动意义的表达上有着明显的不同:être+及物动词的过去分词表达的被动意义更纯粹,着眼点在于受事被动地承受动作的影响和结果,而代动词的“被动”着眼点在于动作行为本身,被动意义弱于前者。
This article compares the past participle of être + with the passive verb in two aspects, namely, whether the actor’s complement can be expressed or not, and whether or not tout (e) (se) (e) es) emphasizes that the difference between body expressions indicates that there is a clear difference between them in passive expression: the passive meaning of the past participle expression of être + transitive object is purer, and the focus is on the passive acceptance of the action and As a result, the “passive” of the substitute verb focuses on the action itself, and the passive meaning is weaker than the former.