对国务院法制办公室组织编辑出版的《行政复议典型案例选编》中的案例分析表明,行政复议制度具有现实的比较优势。权利救济的全面、彻底、专业、高效,个案监督的实现程度高、程度深,以及能够超越个案提升执法水平和完善规范是行政复议比较优势的主要体现。这些比较优势根源于行政复议的行政性,其发挥需要通过一系列制度装置的有效运用来实现。在行政复议法的修改中,应在提供确保行政复议裁决性要求的公正制度装置的前提下,提供发挥行政复议行政性的制度装置,以确保行政复议比较优势的切实发挥。 An analysis of the case studies in the compilation and edition of the “Typical Cases of Administrative Reconsideration” edited and published by the Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council shows that the administrative reconsideration system has a realistic comparative advantage. The complete, thorough, professional and efficient right relief, the high degree and depth of case supervision, and the ability to surpass individual cases to enhance the level of law enforcement and improve regulations are the main manifestation of the comparative advantages of administrative reconsideration. These comparative advantages are rooted in the administrative nature of administrative reconsideration, and their implementation needs to be realized through the effective use of a series of institutional devices. In the revision of the administrative reconsideration law, we should provide the institutional facilities to exert the administrative reconsideration administrative system on the premise of providing the equitable system that ensures the adjudication of the administrative reconsideration, in order to ensure the comparative advantage of the administrative reconsideration to be brought into full play.