论文部分内容阅读
太史公著《史记》,传历史人,列传中有将思想同一源流合为一传者,《老庄申韩列传》即此类。早年读史,不求甚解。老子无为,清静自正,韩子用世,强调人为,何得以类相从?年来读老子五千言,浏览《韩子》,始知太史公目力如炬,无不察照。韩子不啻有《解老》、《喻老》以己意释五千言,而举凡论说均有与老子合者。老子无为,是为有为;韩子用世,以求胜人:择计为用,此其大同。难怪有人说:《老子》实兵家之书,《韩子》为策士之作。又,老子说理,取喻成譬,韩子论策,敷事成教,其手段盖有伺然者。由是,于太史公,遂服膺不已。 近读韩子《说林》,愚以为韩子意与老子合者,概有如有诸端:
Taishi Gongming “Historical Records”, biography of history, biography has the same origin as a preacher, “Lao Zhuang Shen Han Biography” is such. Early history, not understanding. Lao Tzu Inaction, quiet self, Han Zi used the world, emphasizing man-made, why can we be from the class? From Laozi five thousand words to read, browse the “Hanzi”, began to know Taishi Gongmurijuju, all inspection. Han did not have “solution to old”, “metaphor” to the interpretation of five thousand words of their own meaning, and cited all the theory that I have a partner. I do nothing, is promising; Han Zi use the world, in order to win people: choose to count as use, which Datong. No wonder someone said: “Lao Tzu” real soldier’s book, “Han Zi” for the tactician for. Also, Laozi reasoning, analogy into a parable, Hanzi policy, apply precepts, the means covered by the servants. From Yes, in Taishi Gong, then serve endless. Nearly read Hanzi, “said Lin”, stupid thought Hanzi Italy and I belong together, there are all the way: