说起语文教学改革，我想起了两件小事。 一是 1977年恢复高考时，我参加了北京市的阅卷工作。有一篇考生的作文，阅卷的两位老师主张给 80分，但小组长坚持只能给 65至 70分，理由是这篇文章写得有点儿怪，不合“章法”。于是便拿到大组的全体会议上朗读，我主张给 95分。经 Speaking of Chinese language teaching reform, I thought of two small things. First, when the college entrance examination was resumed in 1977, I participated in the marking work in Beijing. There is one candidate’s essay, and the two teachers who read the paper claim 80 points. However, the team leader insists on giving only 65 to 70 points. The reason is that this article is a little weird and does not conform to the “how-to”. So I took a reading at the plenary session of the large group. I advocate giving 95 points. through