随着当代法律的快速发展,“定分止争”一词也“发展”为定份止争、定纷止争,并且频繁出现在各种法学著作和法律讨论中。到底哪个是正确的,使用者众说纷纭却无一定论。本文从法的作用及民事权利分类的角度入手,以物权法、合同法、调解法为实例对各种说法做了分析。 With the rapid development of contemporary law, the term “contention-only contention” has also been used by “development” for the purpose of giving part-time civil warfare. It is a constant struggle and appears frequently in various legal writings and legal discussions. Which is correct in the end, users have different opinions but not certain. Starting with the role of law and the classification of civil rights, this article analyzes the various theories by taking the real right law, contract law and mediation law as examples.