论文部分内容阅读
在《简.奥斯丁与帝国》中,赛义德以后殖民批评的视角,采用“对位阅读”的批评方法,对19世纪英国小说家简.奥斯丁的小说《曼斯菲尔德庄园》进行了解读,提出了“地理”“、空间”体系概念,分析阐述了“叙述与社会空间”的关系。赛义德对于“文化”与“帝国主义”的“共谋”关系的理论见解,以及对文本从政治、文化的角度进行研究的文化策略,使文学和文化批评具有广阔的历史文化视域。赛义德的《简.奥斯丁与帝国》为后殖民批评的美学分析提供了经典范例。该文结合这个范例,研究赛义德的“对位阅读”批评方法,不仅对于透彻理解他的后殖民理论有所助益,而且对于我们的文学批评方法的丰富发展也有诸多启示。
In Jane Austen and the Empire, Syed uses the criticism of “peer-reading” from the perspective of post-colonial criticism to analyze the influence of 19th-century English novelist Jane Austen’s novel Mansfield Manor It also introduces the concept of “geography” and “space” system, analyzes and expounds the relationship between “narration and social space”. Saeed’s theory of “complicity” between “culture” and “imperialism”, as well as his cultural strategy of studying texts from a political and cultural point of view, make literature and cultural criticism have a broad horizon of history and culture. Saeed’s “Jane Austen and the Empire” provide a classic example for the aesthetic analysis of post-colonial criticism. Combining with this paradigm, studying Saeed’s criticism of “peer-reading” not only helps in thoroughly understanding his postcolonial theory, but also provides much enlightenment for the rich development of our literary criticism.