近年来围绕着有关保险人履行说明特别是明确说明义务的纷争增多。由于现行的《保险法》对说明条款也未能“明确说明”,使得保险双方对说明或明确说明的定义、表述、后果等各持一词,即使法官也难判是非曲直,案情相近的案子甚至可以判出南辕北 In recent years, there has been more and more controversy surrounding the performance of the insurer’s instructions, especially the explicit statement of obligations. As the current “Insurance Law” fails to “clearly state” the terms of the explanation, the two parties hold the same definition of “clearly stated” or “clearly stated”, even if the judge has no right or wrong answer, or even the case of a similar case Can be judged south north