论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析Leep手术与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的临床效果。方法:将我院接诊的宫颈糜烂患者200例作为研究对象,回顾性分析她们的临床资料,随机均分为2组,各100例,微波组采取微波治疗,Leep刀组采取Leep手术治疗,对比分析临床效果。结果:两组患者手术时间、术后排液时间对比无显著性差异(P>0.05),但微波组出血量更低(P<0.05);Leep刀组临床总有效率明显高于微波组(P<0.05),其中两组在单纯型上对比无显著性差异(P>0.05),而颗粒型、乳突型患者中Leep刀组明显更优(P<0.05)。结论:宫颈糜烂患者实施Leep手术治疗效果要明显优于微波治疗,值得临床借鉴。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of Leep operation and microwave treatment of cervical erosion. Methods: 200 cases of cervical erosion patients admitted to our hospital as the research object, retrospectively analyzed their clinical data, were randomly divided into two groups, each 100 cases, the microwave group to take microwave treatment, Leep knife group to take Leep surgery, Comparative analysis of clinical results. Results: There was no significant difference in operative time and drainage time between the two groups (P> 0.05), but the blood loss in microwave group was lower (P <0.05). The total effective rate in Leep knife group was significantly higher than that in microwave group P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the simple type (P> 0.05), but the Leep group was significantly better in the granular type and the mastoid type (P <0.05). Conclusion: The effect of Leep surgery is better than microwave treatment in patients with cervical erosion, which is worthy of clinical reference.