论文部分内容阅读
[目的/意义]由于环境创新的双重外部性、复杂性等特点,企业进行环境创新的动力和能力不足。通过对企业与社会网络的互动机制及其对企业绩效的影响进行研究,为企业选择合适的合作伙伴及合作方式来共享优势资源,提高环境创新成功的概率和创新收益,以增强企业进行环境创新的动力有一定的指导意义。[方法/过程]将企业社会网络分为合作网络、辅助网络两种,利用结构方程模型,对不同程度环境创新企业与不同类型社会网络成员的互动,及其对环境创新和企业绩效的影响进行了实证分析。[结果/结论]相对于辅助网络,合作网络能显著促进企业的环境创新活动;相对于环境创新程度低的企业,环境创新程度高的企业与合作网络的合作对其环境创新活动的影响更加有效,且随着环境创新程度的提高,企业环境绩效对经济绩效的影响逐渐从负向变为正向;企业的环境创新活动对环境绩效、经济绩效均存在正向影响,但对环境绩效的提升作用明显弱于经济绩效。
[Purpose / Significance] Because of the double externality and complexity of environmental innovation, the motivation and ability of enterprises to innovate in the environment are not enough. Through the interaction mechanism between enterprises and social networks and its impact on the performance of enterprises to conduct research for enterprises to choose the right partners and cooperation to share the advantages of resources to improve the success of environmental innovation and innovation to increase the probability of benefits to enhance business innovation in the environment The motivation has a certain guiding significance. [Method / Process] The enterprise social network is divided into cooperative network and auxiliary network. Structural structural equation model is used to analyze the interaction of environmental innovation enterprises with different types of social network members and their impact on environmental innovation and business performance Empirical analysis. [Results / Conclusions] Cooperative networks can greatly promote the environmental innovation activities of enterprises relative to auxiliary networks. The cooperation between enterprises with high environmental innovation and cooperative networks is more effective for their environmental innovation activities than those with low environmental innovations , And with the improvement of environmental innovation, the impact of corporate environmental performance on economic performance gradually changes from negative to positive; the environmental innovation activities of enterprises have a positive impact on environmental performance and economic performance, but the improvement of environmental performance The effect is obviously weaker than the economic performance.