论文部分内容阅读
读了《语文学习》2005年第6期上《文体变异:是耶,非耶?》一文,我并不赞同作者对其中两篇学生习作的看法,我认为这两篇作文不能算是好文章。评价一篇文章的优劣,主要从内容和形式上看。具体到议论文,那就是,观点鲜明正确的,论据丰富翔实的,分析中肯有力的,语言简练准确的就是好文章。粗读这两篇文章,很为文章华美的语言和作者思路的开阔与丰富的联想所吸引,但细读两文,就不难发觉
After reading the article “Stylistic Variations: Yes, Not Jesus?” in the “Language Study” issue of 2005, I do not agree with the author’s views on two of these students’ work assignments. I do not think these two articles are good articles. To evaluate the merits of an article, mainly from the content and form. Specific to the argumentation, that is, the point is clear and correct, the arguments are rich and informative, the analysis is powerful, and the language is concise and accurate. Coarse reading of these two articles is very appealing to the open and rich associations of the article’s language and the author’s ideas, but it is not hard to find out if they read the two articles closely.