论文部分内容阅读
文章旨在澄清考察示证范畴(evidentiality)时的基本出发点,主张判断一个语言是否具有示证范畴,以及具有何种示证范畴,必须依据这一语言里的示证语。在此基础上,文章考察了“说是”的各种用法,确认了其作为示证语的地位,并以此为依据,提出普通话具有由“传闻性来源”和“其他来源”构成的二项选择体系,勾勒出汉语普通话的示证体系概貌。最后文章通过实例,指出导入示证范畴的视角,特别是对示证语和示证策略的功能扩张进行考察,可能对解释一些语言现象或语言形式的形成带来启发。
The purpose of the article is to clarify the basic starting point when examining the evidentiality and to determine whether a language has an evidentiary scope and what categories of evidence are to be based on the language of the evidential language. On this basis, the article examines various usages of “say yes” and confirms its status as a demonstrative language. Based on this, it is proposed that Putonghua should have “a source of heresy” and “others” Source "structure of the two options system, outline of the Chinese Mandarin dialect system overview. In the last part of the article, the article points out that the perspective of the category of introduction of evidence, especially the expansion of the functions of the demonstration language and the demonstration strategy, may inspire the formation of some linguistic phenomena or language forms.