论文部分内容阅读
访谈动机:从3月底至今,随着股市的大幅震荡下行,持续一个多月的“救”与“不救”激辩言论甚嚣尘上,各种“救市”消息扑朔迷离。一边是股市持续暴跌下,投资者积蓄起的难以掩盖的强大怨气,一边是面对种种呼声下监管层面区别于以往的“岿然不动”。围绕“政府应不应该救市”这个问题,国内财经评论界也发生了尖锐的分化乃至对立,两派在嗓门分贝明显不对称下甚至惹出了不小的笔墨官司。救,还是不救?是态度问题.还是能力问题?——总之,是个问题。
Motivation for interviews: From the end of March till now, with the stock market’s sharp turmoil, more than a month’s “rescue” and “not save” exacerbated the rhetoric, all kinds of “bailout” news confusing. One side is the stock market continued to plunge, investors can not conceal from the accumulation of strong grievances, while the face of all kinds of calls under the supervision level different from the past “unmoved ”. Around the “government should not save the city,” this issue has also taken place in the domestic financial critics of sharp differentiation and even opposition, the two factions under the apparent asymmetry in voice dB even provoked no small ink lawsuit. Is it a matter of attitude or a problem of ability? In short, it is a problem.