论文部分内容阅读
我国立法以及我国的民法理论均认为法人即意味着法人成员的有限责任。因而出现这样矛盾的局面:民诉意见上的“其他组织”未在法律上取得人格(即不具备法人资格),却又能具有当事人能力(民事权利能力)。然而当事人的诉讼权利能力与民事权利能力应当具有一致性,即享有当事人资格者就应当具有民事权利能力。本文从考察法人人格和有限责任入手,指出我国现有法人理论的缺陷,并进而对法人的理论模式以及业主团体的未来立法模式提出了新的论点。
Our country’s legislation as well as our country’s civil law theory all think the legal person means the limited liability of the legal person member. Therefore, there are such contradictory situations: the “other organizations” in the opinion of the people’s court do not acquire the personality in the law (that is, they do not have the legal personality), but also have the ability of the parties (the capacity of civil rights). However, the litigant rights of litigation and civil rights should be consistent, that is, those who enjoy the qualifications of parties should have civil rights. This article starts with the investigation of personality and limited liability of legal persons, and points out the flaws of the current legal person theory in our country and puts forward new arguments on the theoretical model of legal persons and the future legislative modes of the owners’ organizations.