论文部分内容阅读
台湾地区在2011年完成“法官法”立法。此法取消原来法官比照一般公务员的职等制,无论是否上级法院,所有法官无职级高低之分,只有以工作年资区分俸级,彰显法官异于一般公务员的超然独立地位。另一方面,“法官法”以多元、透明的法官评鉴委员会作为初步评鉴不适任法官的机构,当评鉴决议认为法官应交付惩戒后,最后再由合理组成的职务法庭以公正的司法诉讼程序对涉案法官惩戒作出判决,由此避免司法监督沦为领导干预个案的工具。在实体方面,本法对请求评鉴主体以及请求评鉴事由作合理的限制,避免败诉的当事人挟怨报复。在评鉴事由中,特别强调适用法律之见解,合理限制事后追究法官责任。
Taiwan completed in 2011 “Judicial Law” legislation. This law abolishes the original system of comparing judges with civil servants. Regardless of whether a higher court or a judge of all ranks has a rank of seniority or a lower rank, only the classification of seniority by length of service shows that the judge is different from the detached and independent status of civil servants in general. On the other hand, the “Judicial Law” uses a pluralistic and transparent Judges’ Judgment Committee as the institution for preliminary assessment of unfit judges. When judgments of the judges consider that the judges should be punished by disciplinary measures, then finally, a judiciary constituted by a competent tribunal Fair judiciary proceedings make judgments on the disciplinary actions of the judges involved, thus avoiding judicial oversight as a tool for leading the intervention cases. On the entity side, this Law makes reasonable restrictions on the subject of the request evaluation and the reason for the request evaluation, and avoids retaliation against the party losing the complaint. In the evaluation of the reasons, with particular emphasis on the application of the law of opinion, reasonable restrictions on investigating judges after the responsibility.