论文部分内容阅读
反全球化的人普遍认为,全球化没有实现其消除发展中国家和发达国家之间差距的承诺,实际上反而已经伤害到欠发达国家。但是全球化支持者认为,全球经济和人类发展指数的差距实际上正在缩小。到底哪种看法正确?这很难回答。因为评价全球化及其影响的标准不止一种。格卡兰尼标准:是否实现人类安康学者因杜·格卡兰尼认为,尽管全球化经常以国内生产总值和收入的多寡不均等金融术语来评价,将讨论限制在金融术语来评价,将讨论限制在金融术语的框架之内实际上忍视了问题的重点。格卡兰尼最近在为华盛顿凯托学会进行一项政策分析时写道,中心问题不是收入的多寡不均,而是全球化是否提升了人类的安康生活。格卡兰尼认为,婴儿死亡率、识字率、预期寿命和能否享用安全的饮用水等评价标准,比国内生产总值更能说明一个国家的情况。尽管增加的财力通常能够促进这些指标的提高,但是格卡兰尼在分析报告中写道,“人类安康并不等同于财富”。财富的主要意义在于其提升人类安康生活的潜力。格卡兰尼指出,过去半个世纪的技术和经济进步意味着“普通人现在的寿命更长、吃得更饱、更加健康、受教育程度更高、更愿意将子女送到学校而不是工厂”。
It is generally believed by anti-globalization people that globalization has failed to meet its promise to eliminate the gap between developing and developed countries and in fact has actually hurt the less developed countries. But globalization advocates believe the gap between the global economy and the human development index is actually shrinking. In the end what kind of view is correct? This is difficult to answer. Because there is more than one measure of globalization and its impact. Criticism of Glenclair: Whether or Not to Achieve Human Well-Being Scholars According to Doug Gerani, although globalization is often evaluated in terms of financial terms such as unequal GDP and income, limiting discussion to financial terms is used to evaluate Limits of discussion effectively put the issue’s focus on the issue of financial terminology. In a recent policy analysis by the Washington Kai-Tuo Institute, Kagrani wrote that the central issue is not the unequal income but whether globalization enhances the well-being of mankind. In his opinion, the assessment criteria for infant mortality, literacy, life expectancy and access to safe drinking water are more indicative of a country than GDP. Although increased financial resources often contribute to the improvement of these indicators, Gracani wrote in his analysis that “human well-being does not equate with wealth.” The main significance of wealth lies in its potential to enhance the well-being of human beings. Gekalani pointed out that technological and economic progress over the past half century means that “ordinary people now live longer, eat more, are healthier, have more education, are more willing to send their children to school than factory”.